Back

ⓘ Contract failure




Contract failure
                                     

ⓘ Contract failure

Contract failure describes a situation in which the consumer of a good or service is unable to evaluate its quality, thus incentivizing the producer to produce a lower quality good or service. Such behavior creates suboptimal economic conditions. Contract failure is one explanation for the existence of non-profit organizations, although even non-profits can fall victim to contract failure in the right situations. Contract failure is related to, but distinct from, market failure. Generally, non-profit organizations are more trusted because their corporate structures do not provide incentives to cheat.

                                     

1. Information Asymmetry

The known cause of contract failure is called information asymmetry; when one party the producer has more information than the other party the consumer about a product or service. There is information inequality between the two parties. According to Young, there are three causes in which situations dealing with asymmetric information arise from, to include the following, 1) the quality of a product or service is too complex to be judged such as medical care or higher education; 2) the end consumer of the product or service cannot evaluate it him or herself such as a child in daycare or an elderly individual in a nursing home; and 3) the product or service is not consumed by the individual who purchased it, therefore the purchaser would never know if the producer delivered what was promised.

                                     

2. Nonprofit Existence

When contract failure occurs, there is a suboptimal provision of public goods, which results in market failure. Arrow argues that nonprofits will step in and provide the necessary good or service in response to market failure. When markets potentially take advantage of the information asymmetry situation, nonprofits must protect the consumer.

                                     

3. Non-Distribution Constraint

According to Hansmann, the" non-distribution constraint - prohibits the distribution of residual earnings to individuals who exercise control over the firm”. It prohibits those who have a vested interest in the organization from receiving the organization’s profit for personal gain. This constraint is a common characteristic of nonprofits, which creates less of an incentive for the organization to take advantage of the consumer’s lack of knowledge. The nonprofit has no reason to cheat the consumer out of quality or service delivery because the organizations individuals cannot benefit directly. Therefore, the consumer is more likely to trust a nonprofit organization providing services than to trust a for-profit organization because of the nonprofit’s non-distribution constraint. According to Easley and OHara, state law stipulates that the organizations day-to-day costs should be reasonable.

                                     
  • they entered into a contract the status quo ante Rescission is used throughout the law in a number of different senses. The failure to draw these crucial
  • Austen - Baker Gilmore and the Strange Case of the Failure of Contract to Die After All 2002 18 Journal of Contract Law 1. See Hawkes v Saunders 1782 98 ER
  • A contract of carriage is a contract between a carrier of goods or passengers and the consignor, consignee or passenger. Contracts of carriage typically
  • request a tribunal to direct the Contracting Officer to issue a decision within a specified time or treat the failure to issue a decision as an appealable
  • delivered together, the failure to deliver the printer may be material breach of the entire contract In addition, if a contract is made explicitly for
  • but a failure of mutual assent. In this situation, no contract has been formed, since mutual assent is required in the formation stage of contract Restatement
  • Unfair terms in English contract law are regulated under three major pieces of legislation, compliance with which is enforced by the Office of Fair Trading
  • in earlier bidding. The contract is regarded as optimum because it offers the maximum score while minimizing the risk of failure Our hand Informal A
  • hands. Then the 4 contract would fail by one trick unless West had led a club early in the play However the failure of the contract would not mean that
  • equipment failure The FEMP ESPC program costs about n0 million annually to administer and an additional n million annually to monitor contract performance

Users also searched:

...
...
...